Talk:Tablighi Jamaat - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
 | Tablighi Jamaat was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | |||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
- This article was reassessed on 1 August 2021 (found here). The article was delisted as a Good Article. Legitimate concerns were raised, no opposition or improvements were made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next Good Article Review, whereupon they must be addressed first.--Whiteguru (talk) 01:37, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Tablikhi Jamaat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chanakya11neeti (talk • contribs) 12:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The "Explanation for any connection [to extremism]" section lacks focus. It has become a jumbled dumping ground for criticism. The statements made there largely aren't explanations for connections.
The section's introductory sentence attributes what follows to four people, but many of the 19 sources cited thereafter are not by those people or about their work. It says "by the fact that", but much of what follows is opinion. "In addition", "thus", "despite", and similar connectors are used between unrelated thoughts. In several cases direct quotations are followed by citations of multiple sources, most of which do not contain the quotation.
The section needs extensive cleanup, removal of poor quality sources, reorganization, and trimming of off-topic material. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
মঞ্জিল আর দুয়া 103.67.158.232 (talk) 04:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply