Talk:Wesleyan University - Wikipedia

1 person in discussion

Article Images

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wesleyan University article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Wesleyan University was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 25, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Connecticut High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

"After graduation" section is over-referenced

edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have a general question about how to deal with this kind of citation behavior. The editor writes about scholarships granted (for example) from 2007–2011 and then gives four footnotes, one for each year. I understand what they are trying to do, but it is clunky. @GuardianH, do you have any suggestions? How about @ElKevbo? -- Melchior2006 (talk) 08:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply