User talk:2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 - Wikipedia

While I agree this editor is probably WP:NOTHERE, I'm curious why you're reporting an editor that hasn't had a single edit in almost 4 days, the instructions at AIV are pretty clear. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:59, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

• If an admin feels the report is dated and the account is not disruptive, they're free to make that call. Thank you for your concern. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Reporting days old accounts to AIV is disruptive and a waste of everyone's time. See The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. and This page is intended only for reports about active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  If you find the report disruptive, please template me or report me to the appropriate noticeboard. Otherwise, please deal with truly disruptive accounts and leave me in peace. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Drmies, could you have a look at this user's latest addition of 'controversies' [1] to a few BLPs? There's some POV going on there, methinks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 03:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I deleted that hoaxy draft. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

• Thank you, Drmies. Great minds, etc. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 00:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Not at all--I'm no great mind, but I recognize your handwriting in Recent Changes. ;) Drmies (talk) 00:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • I received the annual invite to attend a gallery bash down in your neck of the woods. Though I'm not attending for many reasons, I did have a lobster roll yesterday. Thought you'd want to know. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 00:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
      • Well I do want to know, but I'd rather shake your hand and get you lunch at Hamburger King down here! Drmies (talk) 01:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
        • The handshake and burger sound great. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 01:25, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Drmies, our disease-happy friend has found another IP range to circumvent your three month block [2]. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

• I've reported at ANI [3]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Drmies, here's a neat one. Longtime WP:BLP issues about a fairly disagreeable notable. The content I reverted had been up over two months. May not rise to the level of defamation, since it appears to be essentially true. But it could be that some page protection is warranted. What think you? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

• Oh dear. Looks like the usual clash in the article history between the whitewashers and the haters, neither of them playing by our rules. That whole article needs to be rewritten. I don't have the energy for that tonight... Drmies (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Quite alright. Just getting it on your radar and locking it for the moment was good. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 04:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bbb23, Favonian, as the two admins most recently involved with a user block and page protection, please have a look to see if new sanctions are merited. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Drmies, can you check for block evasion by the IP? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 02:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

• Sure thing. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Thank you, Drmies. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:3403:CEA8:840D:42FC (talk) 13:58, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply