User talk:AstridMitch - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images
 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There are a ton of sources but few if any are in-depth coverage in RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, AstridMitch! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, AstridMitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeff Bien".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The individual's website is a primary source and IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable source either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Phunware Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Lantana Usman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Melcous (talk) 07:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lantana Usman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lantana Usman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Edwardx (talk) 10:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kenneth Roper, Pickens County Administrator.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Kenneth Roper, Pickens County Administrator.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Salavat, thank you for your response. Kenneth Roper is paying me to create the page, and he provided the image. I may have used an incorrect tag. If I have, could you please send me the link to the correct one? AstridMitch (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Hello AstridMitch. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kenneth Roper, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AstridMitch. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AstridMitch|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Please disclose on your userpage (again). Thanks! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Eejit43

Thank you for your feedback. I created the page with the following tag: ←Created page with '

 This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Kenneth Roper on behalf of Name of your client, if different from your employer for their contributions to Wikipedia.

', which should serve as adequate disclosure that I'm being paid for the page. Although there's COI, I believe the article is objective and that it meets Wikipedia's standards. In any case, I will disclose the COI again on my userpage.

Thanks for your contributions to Knest Manufacturers LLP. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 11:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Draft article not currently submitted for review.

This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.


To be accepted, a draft should:

It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it.



Knest
 
Company typePublic
IndustryBuilding Materials
Founded2014
HeadquartersPune, India

Key people

Nitin Mittal
Chairman and Managing Director
Prashant Agarwal
Chief Operating Officer
Ashish Agarwal
Design Director
Websiteknestaluform.com

Knest Manufacturers LLP manufactures and distributes aluminium formwork. The company was founded in 2014 by Nitin Mittal, the current Chairman and Managing Director.

 
Aerial view of the Knest factory in Pune

Headquartered in Pune, India, Knest supplies aluminium formwork solutions worldwide. The fundamental idea of Knest is to build an efficient construction ecosystem. It has scaled to become a market leader across key parameters, such as production capacity, clientele, and service. [1][2]

Aluminium has extensive use in formwork,[3] panelling, facade design, and structural systems. Knest is the only company in India to provide all standard panels.[4]

  1. ^ "Knest Aluminium Formwork onboards Rahul Dravid as Brand Ambassador". Realty+. 2023-04-13. Retrieved 2023-04-21.
  2. ^ "Knest Aluform is Leading the Green Endeavour for Indian Real Estate, Pioneered by Nitin Mittal". What's Hot. 2021-11-09. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  3. ^ "What is Aluminum Formwork?". About Mechanics. 2023-03-22. Retrieved 2023-04-21.
  4. ^ "Knest Aluform is Leading the Green Endeavour for Indian Real Estate, Pioneered by Nitin Mittal". What's Hot. 2021-11-09. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
AstridMitch (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 04:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

...and has all the hallmarks of paid editing--note the puffery in the bottom half of the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Drmies (talk) 02:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your feedback. I was indeed paid to post this article, but I included the appropriate tags to let you know. I've removed the bottom half of the article, and I believe it's a lot more objective now. AstridMitch (talk) 00:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Safe Haven Baby Boxes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello AstridMitch. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Safe Haven Baby Boxes, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AstridMitch. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AstridMitch|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Vanderwaalforces
I am in no way connected to Safe Haven Baby Boxes, nor have they paid me for writing this article about them. As a strong supporter of the pro-life movement, I only wanted to help the organisation with their charity activity after finding so many good sources online.
Thanks,
AstridMitch AstridMitch (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, AstridMitch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Knest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Based a previous disclosure, I am wondering if Draft:StarApple AI is also commissioned work. If so, please make the required disclosure. --CNMall41 (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I see an attempted disclosure on the talk page but it will need to be completed according to the TOU. Thanks. --CNMall41 (talk) 11:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Much of the content reads like the company website. It needs to be rewritten from the viewpoint of Wikipedia, not the company. In addition, the references fail WP:ORGCRIT in that they are mentions, routine announcements, or not independent (note that some were written by people connected to StarApple AI).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

CNMall41 (talk) 11:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear @CNMall41
Thank you for reviewing my draft and for the guidance you've provided thus far. I've added three new references to the article:
Item 8: Adrian Dunkley Believes in AI for the Public Good
Item 9: Official Wants Protection for Potential Victims of AI Scamming
Item 14: AI Can Improve Public Health
Also, here are the references I consider the WP:THREE -
Item 2: RJR Gleaner Group Acquires 15 Per Cent Stake in Data Analytics Company
Item 3: UCC and StarApple Join Forces in AI Drive
Item 6: You are Reading an NFT
I trust that all is now in order, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. AstridMitch (talk) 06:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I am going to copy this to the draft space if you do not mind. That way all comments are in one location. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, no problem.
Thank you. AstridMitch (talk) 23:57, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Hello, AstridMitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Knest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sirdog was:

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I have taken the time to make an edit to address the tone concerns of the previous reviewer, but I cannot address all of it as for reasons I cannot disclose I cannot access a majority of the sources listed here. Click me for edit. It is imperative, considering the quality of the prose, that Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Words to avoid be read by the draft creator - especially considering their declared conflict of interest.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Sirdog (talk) 06:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, AstridMitch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kenneth Roper, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AstridMitch! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! > Tesseractic: talk? 20:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Tesseractic AstridMitch (talk) 23:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
 

Hello, AstridMitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kenneth Roper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ji11720 (talk) 22:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looking at your recent edit history, it seems that your contributions of late seem to be partially or entirely machine-generated. Am I correct here? If you want to contribute to AFD discussions, you should form your own arguments and not rely on automatic generation, as it tends to be pretty useless. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.35.139.154.158 (talk) 23:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, AstridMitch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:StarApple AI, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, AstridMitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "StarApple AI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply