User talk:BP-Aegirsson - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Hello, BP-Aegirsson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
There's a new rather unsophisticated Draft, Multiphoton microscopy thatoverlaps the 2 articles you have worked on, Second-harmonic imaging microscopy and Two-photon excitation microscopy. I've marked that draft for duplication, but if there is material you want to add, take a look at it. DGG ( talk ) 06:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC) >>Sure I'll look at it;)Reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second-harmonic imaging microscopy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meniscus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Low technology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Technique, Archaic and Lifestyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi BP. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.
The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.
Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.
Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).
All the best - T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 02:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply