User talk:C0273x - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images

  Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Twitter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Can you please review this Wikipedia page? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ODEM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff at ODEM (talk • contribs) 08:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, WPO (company), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The page has triggered a spam filter. WP:PROMO, possible WP:COI - should be submitted via WP:AFC. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please read this notice carefully.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.

A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 06:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, C0273x. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "WPO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 14:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, C0273x! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As this is a company, it will need to meet the guidelines of WP:NCORP. That means references must fall under WP:ORGCRIT. The references used in this draft and the ones I find online do not come anywhere near those guidelines. I do not feel the company meets notability guidelines at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marzocco Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, C0273x. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marzocco Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Foire Internationale d'Art Contemporain (FIAC), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scrooge200 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Scrooge200 (talk) 06:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, C0273x. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Foire Internationale d'Art Contemporain (FIAC), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Foire Internationale d'Art Contemporain (FIAC), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 21:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edmond Safra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chase Manhattan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Chief Digital Officers are not necessarily notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

My formulation was maybe ambiguous. In Monaco, the position names can be trisky: He is not a CDO in the business world's meaning: he is a member of the Government, directly attached to the "Ministre d'Etat" who is in fact... the Prime Minister. I tried to reformulate to make it clearer. C0273x (talk) 08:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 

Hello, C0273x. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frédéric Genta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello C0273x. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Synagogue Edmond Safra, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. I went ahead and reinstated the correct nusach for you along with an added reference. StonyBrook babble 20:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the warning. Edmond Safra himself was a high Sephardic figurs, like his brother Joseph.
All the synagogues named after Edmond Safra are of Sephardic tradition : in Florida, and New York.
Did not want to be rude in reverting your edits, needless to say. C0273x (talk) 12:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Which indeed you did. So I continue now here template-free with a personalized note. The warning template was for engaging in original research in the face of an open and clear source stating that the synagogue is Nusach Ashkenaz. And you chose to respond to that by reverting it back to Sfard (which also happens to be an Ashkenazi rite, but we won't belabor that point). Just because Safra identified as a Sefardi does not automatically guarantee that any or all of his synagogues adopted that rite. That is WP:SYNTH. Nowhere in any of your sources does it say that the Monaco synagogue follows the Sefardi (Edoth HaMizrah) rite. The JP only says that, generally speaking, He firmly believed that every Jewish community should have a synagogue. (emphasis mine) That's it. So you would need a reliable source stating that the Monaco synagogue is something other than Nusach Ashkenaz, which our current source emphatically declares that it is. StonyBrook babble 15:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply