User talk:Coffeeandcrumbs - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
 | This user is not to be confused with User:Coffee and User:CoffeeCrumbs, who are entirely different users. Please do not use the name Coffee to refer to this user as it is ambiguous. You can use C&C. |
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Coffeeandcrumbs. |
|
|||||||||||||
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S% | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RfB candidate | S | O | N | S% | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
No RfXs since 08:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TonyBallioni (talk) 02:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Double the award! Congratulations. Feel free to add Gagarin to the WP:Million Award page as well. Kees08 (Talk) 16:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
| The Visionary Barnstar | |
| Dear Coffeeandcrumbs,
I just want to be the first to congratulate you for your vision and your perseverance to create the first all-space DYK set for July 21. In fact, the whole appearance of the Main Page is a credit to your pioneering vision. It just went live! Enjoy basking in the glow of your stellar achievement! Best, Yoninah (talk) 00:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply |
- Yoninah, thank you for my first barnstar ever! And thank you for your patient and diligent assistance in getting this going. I should say that just as much credit should go to User:Kees08 without whom this would never have been possible. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 15:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
- And a special thanks to Cwmhiraeth. Your act of bravery did not go unnoticed!!! --- Coffeeandcrumbs 17:42, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi, it appeared to me like you did a lot of the work in planning how to recognize the Apollo 11 anniversary this week, and I wanted to make sure you saw a compliment from a reader on WP:VPM. (I would have mentioned it where the discussions were but seems like there were many in different places.) Schazjmd (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
- I agree completely. Great job with the Main page coverage of the 50th anniversary. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:28, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
| ... with thanks from QAI |
- Joining the chorus: quality job on that project! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Well done, it was a great way to celebrate the anniversary. Stephen 23:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
- CaptainEek, this is the best. Thanks! Our coverage of the soviet space programme needs so much improvement. You should join us at Alexei Leonov as we work towards GA. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 00:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your work promoting this vital article! – Reidgreg (talk) 15:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hey bud, quick note to let you know I was impressed by the move discussion you raised here. It's sorta fascinating how controversial "Death of..." article title moves can be, even when the logic seems obvious. Perhaps all the controversy that surrounds these talks reflects the emotion that surrounds the subject of death and dying. Don't get discouraged if the RM doesn't work. Emotion often trumps reason over the short term. But in the end, the truth will out. NickCT (talk) 02:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
- NickCT, I thank you for the kind words. These discussions are difficult but I believe they are important. It is crucial that we question our own preconceptions; objectivity and NPOV are paramount. I always ask myself, what would an alien species who speak perfect English but have no emotions give as the title of this subject? I like to say that we are all biased and we must actively fight that bias. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
| Editor of the Week | ||
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of continuing efforts to improve WP. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:ProcrastinatingReader submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- It is my pleasure to commend User:Coffeeandcrumbs for Editor of the Week. C&C has been an editor for 3 years, and in that time they have created, and contributed to, a staggering number of quality and interesting articles. To pick a small selection of their contributions, many of which improve the encyclopaedia's coverage of women, I've particularly enjoyed reading Mae Jemison, Valentina Tereshkova (GAs) and Elizabeth Willing Powel (FA created from scratch). C&C also does tireless work behind the scenes, particularly at WP:ERRORS, WP:ITN and WP:DYK, and has thousands of edits at these venues. C&C is unfailingly polite, helpful, productive, and a model Wikipedian. I hope this award is a fitting recognition of their continuing efforts to improve the encyclopaedia.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
| Dahlia' |
| Coffeeandcrumbs |
| Editor of the Week for the week beginning January 10, 2021 |
| In a 3 year career they've created many quality and interesting articles improving Wikipedia's coverage of women while tirelessly working to create thousands of edits at WP:ERRORS, WP:ITN and WP:DYK. A Model editor that is polite, helpful and productive. |
| Recognized for |
| working behind the scenes at WP:ERRORS, WP:ITN and WP:DYK. |
| Notable work(s) |
| Mae Jemison, Valentina Tereshkova and Elizabeth Willing Powel |
| Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 04:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
| The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
| Heya! Recently you made an edit to a page I watch and I was really amazed by your diligence! I looked at your contributions and dang! I just wanted to say Thank you! You're doing an amazing job. :) Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 11:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Igor Fruman, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Fruman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I noticed you were involved in a discussion on Calvin Cheng 4 years ago. Unfortunately, it was never resolved. Would you be able to look at it again please? 218.212.161.224 (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey, I came across an edit summary of yours. While I consider your edit to be productive and good faith, I’m not sure that this is best practice in a contentious area.
Would you consider using a different phrasing in the future? FortunateSons (talk) 11:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- No, thank you. The edit summary was appropriate. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 12:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your edit to Marieme Lo at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marieme_Lo&diff=1208741892&oldid=1156486634 I am pretty sure that the academic and the basketball player are two different people. The basketball player was born in 1972, while the academic was born in 1966 according to the library catalog entry for her PhD dissertation. The basketball player attended Central State University, while the academic attended several different institutions including one in Paris for her undergraduate degree. The academic uses a middle name or initial, while the basketball player does not. I am also posting this message at Talk:Marieme Lo, where you may want to comment. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
| Six years! |
|---|
