User talk:DogsRNice - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images
  US Banknote Contest  
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Reply

This was a misclick. Sorry! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

No worries DogsRNice (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
 

Thank you for uploading File:Hammer editor icon.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RimWorld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dublin Irish Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magician.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. Sourcing falls far short of the requirements of WP:GNG, and mayors of small towns (i.e. under 100K) are not generally considered notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Clarityfiend (talk) 03:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, DogsRNice! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 03:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, DogsRNice. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cephas Perry Quattlebaum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, DogsRNice. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cephas Perry Quattlebaum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

First, thank you for adding short descriptions to articles that need them. Just some advice that when possible, please try to stay under 40 characters in length per WP:SDFORMAT. Sometimes it helps to avoid repeating words from the title in the short description. Thanks! -- GoneIn60 (talk) 20:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I always try to keep at as short as possible but places often present an issue since specifying the location (something like "city, state, country" which seems important to add since wikipedia is used by people around the world) can take up quite a few characters, and honestly 40 characters is insufficient for some concepts, at least from what I can come up with.
But I will make an effort to shorten them more. DogsRNice (talk) 20:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
No worries, just thought I'd mention it, but it looks like you're already aware! I think the main reasoning behind it is so that the description doesn't get cut off on mobile devices that have lower resolutions. Cheers! --GoneIn60 (talk) 22:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello! You seem to have an interest in the recent death of Elizabeth II, so I wanted to invite to the WikiProject of Current Events new task force The London Bridge Task Force, which will be working on improving all the articles around the death of Elizabeth II. A task force is similar to a WikiProject, which is where you can communicate with other editors who all have the same goal, which is improving all the articles around a specific topic. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 23:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
  Previous issue | Index

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
  Previous issue | Index

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?

  Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!

Due to budget and procrastination limitations, we've only had time to review the first ~39% of the scripts since last issue. Help us out here! Aaron Liu (talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Hello everyone, and welcome to the 24th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. Uh-huh, we're finally covering the good ones among the rest! Aren't you excited? Remember to include a link in double brackets to the script's .js page when you install the script, so that we can see who uses the script in WhatLinksHere! The ScriptInstaller gadget automatically does this. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!

Making user scripts load faster by SD0001 is this month's featured script, which caches userscripts every day to eliminate the overhead caused by force-downloading the newest version of scripts every time you open a Wikipedia page. Despite being released in April 2021, our best script scouters have failed to locate it due to its omission from the US of L. For security reasons, the script only supports loading JavaScript pages.

  Newly maintained scripts

edit

After earthly attempts at improving the original have failed...

 
Without caching. Each script takes 400–500ms. A particularly large script takes 1.11 s! Internet download speed is 50 Mbps.
 
With caching enabled. Each script takes just 1-2 ms to load.
 

Unfortunately, this section has remained nearly identical. Help us out here!

  • Ahecht/RedirectID adds the redirect target to all redirects. For all the WP:NAVPOPS haters. (Do these exist?)
  • Dragoniez/MarkBLockedGlobal: Remember the "strike blocked usernames" gadget? Now you can use a red, dotted line to highlight rangeblocks and global locks!
  • GhostInTheMachine/GraphicReplyLink replaces the [ reply ] link with 💬, which is some sort of rainy cloud I guess?[Joke]
  •  
    Jonesey/common (pictured) has some styles to overhaul your Vector 2022 experience. It reduces padding everywhere, and makes the top bar animation faster.
    • Aaron Liu/V22 is a fork that narrows the sidebars instead of upheaving them, reverts the January 2024 dropdown changes, and restores the old page-link color for links that don't go outside the current wiki.
  • Nardog: SmartDiff is a spiritual successor to Enterprisey/fancy-diffs. It makes the page title part of links in diffs clickable, along with template and parser function calls. Unnamed parameters can be configured per template to also be linked. All links are styled based on the normal CSS classes of rendered links.
  • Phlsph7/ClassicalTOC (Vector 2022) reinserts the inline table of contents to pages under Vector 2022.
  • For the paranoid: Rublov/anonymize replaces your username at the top of the screen with the generic "User page" text. Remember, it is your duty to persuade everyone that editing is an honor.
  • Sideswipe9th/Vector 2022 Floating Tools Menu moves the Page Tools menu to the left and makes it float along with the table of contents.
  • Sm8ps/SectionEditing makes pressing Tab ↹ toggle the visibility of the tiny [ edit ] links next to section headings.. Not a great name, eh?
  • The wub/tocExpandAll adds a button on top of the floating ToC to expand or collapse subheadings.

Permissions required!

edit

Yes, we're just doing 'em as we go now. Thanks for reading through this looong issue, if you did! I'm sure this'll send a record for the longest issue ev-ah. You may need to wait even longer for the last issue, as our reserve of old-y and goodie scripts have ran out... We encourage you to try and do some of the requests or improvement tasks. See you in Summer, hopefully!


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, welcome to the 25th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 March 2024. We've got a ton of wonderful editors taking back their pitchforks today. Don't worry, for they come in peace, to forcibly fix and extend existing scripts you use with sheer passion. There's so many, them forks have got what's basically their own column now! gift us with some rows before it's too late Aaron Liu (talk) 04:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!

inline-diff-inline-patrol by Ponor is this edition's featured script. By loading diffs inline on every page that shows a list of changes, it implements the 2023 community wish m:Community Wishlist Survey 2023/Admins and patrollers/Inline diffs and inline patrol. Hopefully we won't need this script anymore soon, with the WMF's focus on the backlog...

 
 
Scripts++ Newsletter

  • After the RIIJ(rewrite it in jQuery) update, Aaron Liu: Watchlyst Greybar Unsin has a dismiss button that allows you to mark an item as read in one click and cycle to the next Watchlist item.
  • Lordseriouspig/StatusChangerImproved is just like Enterprisey's script, except you select your status from a dropdown instead of cycling through them with a button. The WMF operates out of car-centric infrastructure anyway. Shame!

  Newly maintained scripts

edit


Hi!

I wanted to explain the changes I had made on 1 August 2024 on the aforementioned list.

I had originally made the edit because I felt that it was too definitive to say that the fire was caused by arson as the DA of Butte County had, himself, said he did not believe that suspected arsonist Ronnie Dean Stout II had actually intentionally started the fire. [1]

At the time, I believed that making such a statement on what is surely a popular wiki page was could potentially do unintended damage to the suspect reputation.

However, looking at more articles, I am...uh...significantly less inclined to be coming to the defense of Mr. Stout. [2] And, look, plainly, I don't think there was any other "real" source of the fire. Proper sentencing or not, I don't think it would be the most wrong thing in the world to call it arson. [3]

Best Asminnow (talk) 02:10, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah that makes sense, thanks for letting me know DogsRNice (talk) 03:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply