User talk:Dollasdal - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Hello, Dollasdal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category:Emergency management in South Korea, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
A tag has been placed on Category:Emergency management in South Korea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foramen magnum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spinal arteries. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of anatomy mnemonics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ASP and Dens.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cerebral crus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spine.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian reservation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BIA.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Dollasdal
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Yoblyblob and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Cultural language, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 6 § Cultural language.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Yoblyblob}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Brodmann area 4
- added a link pointing to External granular layer
- Cerebral cortex
- added a link pointing to Molecular layer
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us. It's also a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you! There are many colleagues for medical articles! Dollasdal (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SDA Bocconi School of Management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi Dollasdal! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Tradition of removing shoes in the home and houses of worship that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DoctorMatt (talk) 20:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Dollasdal: Seconding this. Please use edit summaries. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 15:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Sorry, finally I turned on this option. Dollasdal (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The page Otago Univesity has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Cardiac function curve
- added a link pointing to Preload
- Cardiac output
- added a link pointing to Preload
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fibroblast growth factor 23, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encode.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Dollasdal,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Miminity, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Intrinsic ocular muscle, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hello, Miminity? I added more contents and made it more clear. Dollasdal (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Intrinsic ocular muscle. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Only one setence is sourced.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I added citations as much as possible. Can you review it again? Dollasdal (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Intraocular muscles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!