User talk:Donovank - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images
This user may have left Wikipedia. Donovank has not edited Wikipedia since 28 April 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
 

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Kirill [talk] [prof] 01:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Donovank! I am The ed17 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Ed (talkmajestic titan) 05:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ed (talkmajestic titan) 05:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's coming along well! Some thoughts:

  • This isn't a big deal, but remember that you only want to report the facts, not prove a point. It's a small but noticeable difference from normal history papers, where you want to formulate a thesis and prove it.
  • The citations should be after the period, ie like this: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.[1] I've changed this for you. :)
  • "Over 21 million people were killed or injured in World War I; in many cases, all of the men in one family were killed, cities were destroyed, and family life was greatly impacted"
    • May want to clarify just where you are talking about, as no cities in the US were destroyed!
  • "Between the years 1870 and 1910 ..."
    • Why does this matter? WWI didn't start until 1914
  • "Over the course of the war, the United States mobilized 4.3 million men and endured an estimated 350,000 casualties"
    • How many mobilized were actually sent into combat? How many were killed/how many injured?
  • "Additionally, many of these men were not very old when they left for war; many were in their teens and most were under the age of 30."
    • "Many" and "most" is redundant. I'd suggest "many were in their teens and virtually all were under the age of 30." if it's supported by your source (I'm not sure how true that is statement is, so you better check :)
  • "During this time, post-traumatic stress was considered cowardice, and many men were shot for showing weakness"
    • When was this? In/after a battle? I've never heard of this.
  • "Additionally, weapons advanced and new technologies such as the Zeppelin, a German airship, which could release a number of bombs at one time, created huge casualties and made war even deadlier than before"
    • Do you mean 'advanced weaponry'? More examples of these deadly weapons would be good, namely the introduction of the machine gun.
  • You say "World War I altered education in the United States through of federal programs offered and curriculum changes.", then move to patriotism and nationalism, which are not federal programs nor curriculum?
  • What is the "History World International" reference referring to? I don't see it in the bibliography.
  • The Politico reference ("Woodrow Wilson Endorses Women's Suffrage on Sept. 30, 1918") could be replaced by a New York Times article, I'll bet (which I think would be a better source). Try searching their archives here, but be sure to use the advanced search to limit the date to September/October 1918.
  • I hate to do this to you, but http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/FWWcasualties.htm ("First World War Casualties") isn't reliable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Any chance you can find a book at your library or on Google Books' limited/full preview that gives the same information? This Signpost article may be of use here, as might the editorial I wrote in the last Military history Project newsletter (at the bottom).

It's coming along well! If I can suggest, I would look at the World War I article and other similar topics and try to emulate the way they present their information. Don't forget to create an introduction! :) —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 05:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello again! Ruth asked me to drop by to help you with citation templates. Basically, they are an easy way to format your references Wikipedia-style. To see how {{cite book}} is used in practice, click here. Other templates you can use are {{cite web}}, which is for web sites, and {{cite journal}}, which is for journals, and {{cite news}}.
Having said all of that, your current usage of Chicago style is also fine (I did that myself while writing North Carolina-class battleship). Your choice! :) —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 05:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also, BoyScoutStuff.com is probably not reliable... :/ —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 05:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ladies, it would be a good idea to check and respond to peer review comments. Auntieruth55 (talk) 22:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

we would love to! but we have no idea how to find them! How do we get to them? Thanks! :)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've assessed the article as Start-class for the military history project, but I have a question for you concerning the peer review you ask for: There are two seperate avenures for a peer review on Wikipedia, one run by the encyclopdia in general and one run exclusively by the military history project. When I looked at the talk pages you had the PR templates for both process on the talk page, but at the moment the only PR you have filed was the later of the two options listed above. For this reason I removed the PR template at the top of the page, but to be safe I wanted to determine if you were really interested in have both Peer Reviews run for the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Are you still working on this article? I still have some concerns regarding citations. Please keep me posted. I believe that the 28 days for a normal review cycle expire soon. Please let me know how you want to proceed here MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 21:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.Reply

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the projectwhat coordinators do) 08:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 18:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply