User talk:Jackie.salzinger - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Hello, Jackie.salzinger! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place |
|---|
|
|
You are invited to join the discussion at Draft talk:Theresa Greenfield. Peaceray (talk) 16:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jaafar Abdul Karim—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mawj Aldarraji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mawj Aldarraji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
A tag has been placed on Rami Daher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Jackie.salzinger
Thank you for creating Witches of Bo'ness.
User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for the article, nice reading!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Please remember to put all {{stub}} tags at the end, not the top of the article - see WP:ORDER. In this case another editor added a second stub tag because they didn't see yours in the wrong place, and then Mccapra added categories after that stub template instead of before it, so by the time I came to stub-sort it there were two stub tags in wrong places. Thanks. PamD 13:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hallo, Thank you for creating National Syndicate of Tunisian Journalists. When you create an article like this with alternative titles in the lead, please make sure that the reader can find it from those other titles (ie Syndicat National des Journalistes Tunisiens and SNJT), by creating a redirect, adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different title. I've created these two redirects (and created a dab page at UTAP). Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 13:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Shrike (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also please note that you not allowed to edit content regarding the I/P conflict --Shrike (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
- A bit of background as to why: only editors with 500 edits who have been around for 30 days are allowed to edit articles about the Arab–Israeli conflict, due to a decision of the Arbitration Committee (the decision is linked above). This is unfortunately necessary to make it more difficult for determined disruptive editors to cause problems with sockpuppet accounts. You're welcome to edit constructively in the topic area once you've cleared those two thresholds.
- (I have no stake in this, but came across this comment and figured it deserved a longer explanation) Vahurzpu (talk) 01:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Hanieh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibn al-'Arabi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yasmine Seale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasmine Seale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hi thanks for creating this. Could you please add labels to the images as it’s not clear what they show. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
An article you recently created, Mohamed Abdelaziz Dja'it, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi a few pieces of advice for you. First if you want to introduce Arabic script into an en.wiki article the best way to do it is to use the template {{lang-ar|اي حاجة}}. This seals the Arabic text off from the surrounding English and stops it messing up dates, brackets and other things.
Second, you’re not sourcing your articles properly. Something like Mohamed Abdelaziz Dja'it is absolutely not ready for mainspace with just one source. I rescued it because I’m a member of WikiProject Tunisia and able to search in Arabic so can see there are sources, but actually this is your job when you create the article. If you create articles with a single source, especially on topics where most new page reviewers can’t search or don’t have specialist knowledge, they are going to get moved to draft or possibly even put up for deletion. Please add sufficient sources to future articles - in Arabic or other languages is fine, they don’t have to be in English.
Lastly, I don’t know if you’re referring to articles in fr.wiki or ar.wiki when you create new en.wiki articles, but if you are, even just a bit, you are required for copyright reasons to acknowledge this which you should do in your first edit summary. Even if you’re not borrowing or translating, it is a good idea to link to those articles because they help reviewers to assess notability. If you’re not sure how to do that I’ll happily show you if you like. All the best Mccapra (talk) 12:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Levy (Middle East expert). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and the subject doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Also, was previously created at this disambiguation, Daniel Levy (political analyst) then deleted by Liz. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Daniel Levy (Middle East expert), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, Jackie.salzinger. Thank you for your work on General Union of Cultural Centres (Gaza). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
{{subst:db-significance-notice|Mawj Aldarraji|header=1}} ~~~~