User talk:Miminity - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
 | This user is in school. This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time. |
NOTICES:
- Starting August 12, 2024, I can not immediately answer any questions, inquiries, notices, etc. because I am going to attend my college classes. THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND CONSIDERATION!
 | Please read this box first! Welcome to my talk page! Questions, information, warnings? Say it here! Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, please sign your topic by placing ~~~~ (four tildes) at the very end, and please remember, assume good faith! You can click here to start a new topic. |
| Current Time in my Country (Refresh the clock) | |
|---|---|
| 8:07 am, 26 September 2024 PHT [refresh] |
Sign my Guessbook by clicking the red button
FAQ
1. Why you reverted my edit/s?
- A: I notice your contributions are either generally unconstructive or unsourced, If you think I was wrong, let me know and explain it to me : )
2. Why you decline my submission?
- I put the reason why your draft is declined, please read it (sometimes, I even put comment for clarification). If you need help try asking Wikipedia:Teahouse.
3. Why you tagged the article I created for speedy deletion/Article for Deletion?
- I done the process before tagging it, and I believe that it is against what Wikipedia is whether it is something that is on the criteria for speedy deletion or what wikipedia is not.
| 3 | This user page has been vandalized 3 times. |
Thank you for your review of this page. I'm in the process of adding references and would appreciate your feedback. MerlinsMagic (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Article Draft:Thierry Rayer
Dear Moderators,
I am writing to seek your assistance regarding the feedback you provided on the article in question. First, I would like to thank you for your comments and for the work you do to maintain the platform’s quality standards.
However, I am somewhat surprised by some of your remarks, particularly those indicating that certain phrases appear too promotional. Our intention is simply to faithfully transcribe information from media outlets and official sources, such as ministries or museums. I would therefore like to raise a few points to clarify the situation.
Firstly, could you please identify the specific phrases or information that you find promotional? This would help us make the necessary adjustments while remaining faithful to the sources we have carefully selected. It is crucial not to alter the content of information from official or journalistic sources, as this might compromise its accuracy.
Secondly, I would like to emphasize that all references cited in the article come from reliable, recognized, and verifiable sources. The excerpts written are directly based on these sources to ensure accuracy and compliance. It would be helpful if you could review these references in detail, as they form the foundation of the article and ensure the reliability of the presented information.
I therefore wonder how these sources are being taken into account during the evaluation process. Have you had the opportunity to review them thoroughly? By doing so, you will see that the article is solely based on factual and verified information, drawn from credible and objective publications.
Our goal is to contribute in a neutral, objective, and well-documented manner. We would be very grateful if you could guide us on the necessary adjustments to meet your expectations while maintaining the integrity of the sources.
Thank you for your attention, and I remain at your disposal for any further clarification.
Sincerely, Inspiringflow (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Inspiringflow: Please read the comment my fellow editor left on the draft.
- Also please stop using AI to write your reason. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hello How are you ?
- Regarding this feedback,
- I took them into account and I have just made a complete modification to all of the article. please consult it again in order to enlighten me more on what remains to be done,
- Speaking of the sources he spoke about, I would like to emphasize the fact that these are reliable sources that I use and I would never use corrupt or manipulate sources,
- with all my respect for your work, please consult the article again in order to give me feedback if there are any possible corrections to be made to the article
- Thank you very much Inspiringflow (talk) 12:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/db/Thierry_Rayer_Awards.jpg/220px-Thierry_Rayer_Awards.jpg
- Additionally,
- please see this photo I don't put corrupt sources, if you say or insist that I put corrupt sources then you would mean by that that even the people in the photo are corrupt?
- be very careful with your words, I did not put this photo for nothing, it is to further strengthen the credibility of my statements, and you will clearly see in these photos that the people present are senior executives,
- this photo also brings together all of my conferences which took place in the United Arab Emirates and elsewhere, I work in humanitarian work and if it was for other reasons, I would have put photos everywhere.
- I strongly insist that these sources are very reliable.
- So review your feedback THANKS Inspiringflow (talk) 13:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I would like to emphasize once again that my writing style aligns with UNESCO's principles, and it is solely within this context that I write my articles. UNESCO only speaks of peace and well-being, and there is nothing promotional about my statements. I do not promote any individual or anyone else. Everything I talk about here concerns the works I have accomplished, all the actions I have undertaken. I work in humanitarian aid, and I address the same topics as UNESCO. I give conferences with senior and influential officials, in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, as I mentioned earlier. Everything I say is verifiable with the extremely reliable sources I have included in the article.
- I go to Geneva to give conferences at the UN, etc.
- There is also the Minister of Culture.
- Look at all the photos I have posted of myself with princesses, with ministers, even with the most famous Minister of Culture. There are ambassadors from Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, everyone is there. Despite this, you claim that I pay journalists, that the sources I provide are not reliable at all. Are you serious?
- Please be very careful with your words. Verify the sources properly, take the time to thoroughly check each piece of information before making defamatory accusations against me. If you say all of this, are you insinuating that all these high-ranking officials are corrupt? That they are fake?
- After all the sources, references, photos, etc., that I provide, you dare to say they are false?
- I invite you to thoroughly verify the information in my article, the sources, the references, etc., before saying anything.
- And when you say that I paid someone to publish the article, are you serious? The person in the article’s photo is the director of the Louvre Abu Dhabi museum, not just anyone.
- So, be very careful with what you say. Are you insinuating that an influential person would have paid a journalist to publish an article? These are defamatory statements you are making.
- I do volunteer work, humanitarian work. I go to Africa to help poor children, disadvantaged families, and others. I work in humanitarian aid and help them access a good education, etc.
- I have even risked my life several times doing humanitarian work. Tell me, what interest do I have in doing it? Other than constantly risking my life trying to make a difference for the less fortunate?
- What you’re saying doesn’t make sense. So, reconsider your statements. Inspiringflow (talk) 14:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please can you let me know what are the mistakes this article Acharya Rajkumar Pandey has. Autobotai (talk) 09:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Autobotai:
- The tone sounds like you are promoting the person (e.g.
a renowned Vedic astrologer and spiritual guide, known for his expertise in astrology, numerology, Vaastu, and Tarot card reading.
Note that this is only one the entire "Career and Expertise" was full of WP:PEACOCK words. - Need more secondary sources to verify the claims for his "his expertise in astrology, numerology, Vaastu, and Tarot card reading." as it currently regards as WP:FRINGETHEORY. (Note: Astrology is considered as a pseudoscience.)
- Google News, provides no sources him. Only WP:PASSINGMENTION.
- The tone sounds like you are promoting the person (e.g.
- Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Article Draft:Thierry Rayer
I would like to emphasize once again that my writing style aligns with UNESCO's principles, and it is solely within this context that I write my articles. UNESCO only speaks of peace and well-being, and there is nothing promotional about my statements. I do not promote any individual or anyone else. Everything I talk about here concerns the works I have accomplished, all the actions I have undertaken. I work in humanitarian aid, and I address the same topics as UNESCO. I give conferences with senior and influential officials, in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, as I mentioned earlier. Everything I say is verifiable with the extremely reliable sources I have included in the article.
I go to Geneva to give conferences at the UN, etc.
There is also the Minister of Culture.
Look at all the photos I have posted of myself with princesses, with ministers, even with the most famous Minister of Culture. There are ambassadors from Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, everyone is there. Despite this, you claim that I pay journalists, that the sources I provide are not reliable at all. Are you serious?
Please be very careful with your words. Verify the sources properly, take the time to thoroughly check each piece of information before making defamatory accusations against me. If you say all of this, are you insinuating that all these high-ranking officials are corrupt? That they are fake?
After all the sources, references, photos, etc., that I provide, you dare to say they are false?
I invite you to thoroughly verify the information in my article, the sources, the references, etc., before saying anything.
And when you say that I paid someone to publish the article, are you serious? The person in the article’s photo is the director of the Louvre Abu Dhabi museum, not just anyone.
So, be very careful with what you say. Are you insinuating that an influential person would have paid a journalist to publish an article? These are defamatory statements you are making.
I do volunteer work, humanitarian work. I go to Africa to help poor children, disadvantaged families, and others. I work in humanitarian aid and help them access a good education, etc.
I have even risked my life several times doing humanitarian work. Tell me, what interest do I have in doing it? Other than constantly risking my life trying to make a difference for the less fortunate?
What you’re saying doesn’t make sense. So, reconsider your statements. Inspiringflow (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Please reconsider submitting or making an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY as it is highly discourage. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi Miminity!
After addressing the issue, I've gone and removed the (only primary sources) tag that you put on Draft:Scaled Composites 437. If you still feel it needs addressing, feel free to chuck it back in :)
Unexpectedinquisition (talk) 10:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Nah, It's good. Thanks for expanding it. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- It's okay. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
An article you recently created, 2024–25 Lesotho Premier League, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Huh? Why I was notified about this I don't even created this article LOL. Also, base on my logs, I already draftified it. See User:Miminity/Draftify log, if the author move the article again in the mainspace I will tag it for AfD. Anyhow, thanks for the work. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey Miminity, I've noticed that you're often tagging articles about issues several minutes after they've been created. Please be aware that this may be considered WP:BITEY, and that it's an NPP best practice to wait at least an hour from the last constructive edit to add relevant maintenance tags. See also WP:NPPHOUR. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Hey man im josh: Okay noted. Thanks for letting me know! Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello Miminity,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, Nellore for deletion, because it's a redirect to a non-existent or deleted page.
If you don't want Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, Nellore to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Waqar💬 08:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Iwaqarhashmi: thanks for deleting it, didn't know the original title was deleted. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Sri Irukalala Parameswari Ammavari Temple. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seminita (talk) 08:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello Miminity,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sri Irukalala Parameswari Ammavari Temple, Nellore for deletion, because it's a redirect to a non-existent or deleted page.
If you don't want Sri Irukalala Parameswari Ammavari Temple, Nellore to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Waqar💬 08:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Once again thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I just noticed you placed linkrot tag on the pages I just created, I am quite aware about the the usage of Refill but unfortunately I tried using Refill but its just stating 'Pending' can you try once from your end if its working or not, Thanks Suryabeej ⋠talk⋡ 06:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Same here, that's why I just tag it with bare url. Don't worry about it. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
An attempt to write articles about temples related to List of Natchathara temples article is carried out by me.
hello, I'm a semi official representative connected to Luma3ds and I just wanted to come and inform you that the Luma3ds page you marked for speedy deletion was not sanctioned by the community nor created by an official representative connected to the project
given Luma's history and status as the only currently usable 3ds cfw it MIGHT warrant its own page, but certainly not one created by some random guy
ok thanks bye
Eip618 (talk) 00:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I CSD it because:
- Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- hello,
- I did not create the page, and I am not arguing the speedy deletion (in fact I agree with it)
- I merely came to put on the record that 'the community' associated with the project did not ask for this page to be created and we have no affiliation with the person who did create it, so if it does qualify as an advertisement, it's not one approved by us
- again, I agree with the CSD and no further action is necessary, this is purely informational :)
- Eip618 (talk) 00:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Oh okay, Thanks for clarification. Sorry for that. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Regarding your revert of my edit on the article Gavyn I personally know the person who vandalized this, as I witnessed it myself. A google search also doesn't pull up anything of note showing a WP:Notability violation. The people it mentions he's "friends with" also violate WP:BLP and WP:Notability. Sqadi (talk) 02:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Clarification. I use the "rollback" button I have. So I cannot have an edit summary. I notice you remove the {{given name}} template. So, I revert it. You can revert it back but do not remove the {{given name}} template Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for the clarification! Sqadi (talk) 02:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The redirect Lucky Guy ( 2023 ) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 25 § Lucky Guy ( 2023 ) until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 14:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
