User talk:Technophant - Wikipedia

I am semi-active, response time may be days to weeks.

  Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Syria/Syrian Civil War task force, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Syria/Syrian Civil War task force and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Syria/Syrian Civil War task force during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 17:33, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I was too late on to vote, however I marked it as inactive and I'm fine with deletion. Technophant (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hey Technophant, have you seen my response? Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 12:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just a quick note, as I saw your edit on the Death of Darren Rainey page: There is no NSFW on Wikipedia; it is uncensored and for educational purposes. See Wikipedia:NOTCENSORED

Happy editing! Kirby777 (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have closed your topic ban appeal as unsuccessful. There was also a consensus that you may not appeal this topic ban again for two years from this date. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@ScottishFinnishRadish: I wish the users at AN put more effort and time into their decisions. There may be more than this, but the “straw that broke the camel’s back” was a edit that slightly reformatted a reference link, a revision that produced the same text output as the original but didn’t need to be reverted but did by Doc James. How do I search for only my edits for a topic or page? Technophant (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I hope you don't mind a word from me, but there really was no other way that appeal at AN was going to go, no matter how long it stayed open or how much time people put into it. And the "straw that broke the camel's back" edit, if there is one, is not really relevant. Your topic ban is based on your general approach to alternative medicine topics, which does not appear to be in line with the Wikipedia approach. That approach is to base content on what the consensus of mainstream medical science says, and not on our own disagreements with that, alternative analysis of evidence, our own opinions, or claims of personal experience and expertise. If mainstream medical science turns out to be wrong on a specific issue, Wikipedia will echo that only after the medical consensus has changed. In short, your approach to writing about medical topics and Wikipedia's approach are not compatible, so you really will need to find different topics to write about here. I do think it would be best for you to stay away from medical topics, and I wish you well with your health issues. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply