User talk:Wingwatchers - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
Hello Wingwatchers, just wanted to check in and see if you are confirmed reviewing my article on Begotten for FA status. No need to rush either way considering I failed the last two times and I want to get this one right. If you are unable to review I could always use suggestions on who would review it. Anyways, have a good one. Paleface Jack (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- It's an excellent article. I think I will be reviewing it soon once I finished my personal projects. It will probably be after when the second user have posted their review. Wingwatchers (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Alright sounds good.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frozen (2013 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBR.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you today - on Thanksgiving Day - for Frozen II, "about an animated musical fantasy film by The Walt Disney Company"! Enjoy your first TFA day! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
You are recipient no. 2896 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you so much! Wingwatchers (talk) 17:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi Wingwatchers. A while ago, you expanded Pokémon, and placed certain refs in "Attributed to multiple references" notes. I just wanted to let you know that I slightly altered how this is done, separating the 'multi-refs' from the footnotes. I hope you like it. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 19:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frozen (2013 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flemish.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Safari (web browser) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sohom (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pokémon Sword and Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 15:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
The article Pokémon Sword and Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pokémon Sword and Shield and Talk:Pokémon Sword and Shield/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 22:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The article Pokémon Sword and Shield you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pokémon Sword and Shield for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 11:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply