Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amal Alamuddin - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Amal Alamuddin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable. all the reliable sources about her (Time, ABC, International Business Times) it's all about her being George Clooney's girlfriend. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Amal Alamuddin is an accomplished lawyer in her own right. She may have come on the radar via George Clooney, but she is notable because of the following facts: (a) Her body of work in the Human rights law arena (b) Her consultancy in International law with the United Nations on Syria and (c) Her legal representation of Julian Assange. All the reliable online sources list these facts.Fsmatovu (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Notability is having "significant coverage" of her. Where is all this significant coverage you speak of? LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No coverage to indicate she is notable as a lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.