Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auguste Pahl - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. I will leave a redirect to Oldest people. — Scientizzle 23:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another very old person with nothing else to be said about them other than born died, aged was X. The only references in the article are brief entries in lists, and when I tried a google search I found no further coverage in reliable sources. Without substantial coverage in reliable sources, this person fails WP:BIO. She is already listed in Oldest people and Oldest validated person by year of birth, so the article should be deleted. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. See also WP:BIO1E, which she also fails. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(UTC)
- Delete Just getting old does not satisfy WP:BIO. Inclusion in a list is appropriate and sufficient. Edison (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge No substantial independent, reliable sources to establish meeting WP:N or WP:BIO. Nothing here that couldn't be summarized in the many supercentenarian lists. Cheers, CP 17:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.