Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilbagh Singh - Wikipedia


Article Images
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dilbagh Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Bump from speedy: obvious COI problems, but assertion of notability via OBE. No opinion. Quarl (talk) 2007-02-16 07:21Z

The guidelines for page deletion are as below - For deletion due to copyright issues, when and how this should be done, and alternatives, see: Wikipedia:Copyright problems.

- For a guide to deletion discussions, especially if your content is listed for deletion, see Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.

- For the administrators' deletion guide, see Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators.

This page does not violate copyright issues This page is not a subject in deletion discussion Apart from the above 2, I do not see how this page can be removed without administrator's deletion guide This is a public forum and I want to write something about my great grandfather so I can keep his memory alive Rest is up to you guys

Sardar Bahadur Dilbagh Singh .... comment copied here from article page by Mereda 19:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the name of the link in article on Sikh to 'Sardar Bahadur Dilbagh Singh'. I do hope that Ill be allowed to use this name By the way, my great grandfather was not a local hero. At the time when he was district magistrate in Lyallpur, it was one of the most influential cities under British Rule in India The title of Sardar Bahadur allowed him to hold public court in his home. I never met him but what I gathered from my family, inspite of the power he held, he understood the responsibility it carried with it.

  • Comment Like it says in the guideline WP:N, it's about having sufficient source material for a verifiable, encyclopedic article about each topic. There's no evidence here about written source material, so it's not viable. The article can always be recreated if evidence is found in future. Mereda 10:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.