- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- F Denholm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. Not even his first name is known BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails GNG unless further sources are dug up. Geschichte (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There are alot of nominations for deletions for articles on rugby league footballers where there first name isn't known, I think they should all be nominated in the same AfD. ビッグツリ64 (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Block evasion Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Bundling them altogether would just be a WP:TRAINWRECK so, no. I also fail to see how that would be 'speedy keep' grounds. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As far as I can see totally fails GNG. Subject does get a few very routine mentions in match reports (but, if the same person, for another club?), but nothing anywhere near in-depth. Aoziwe (talk) 07:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and also based on search results presented by Aoziwe. Cbl62 (talk) 14:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The sourcing here is inadequate. My search for sourcing turned up nothing. As Aoziwe was only able to find a few passing mentions in rugby coverage, there is no indication of more coverage. Sport notability guidelines and other special notability guidelines are meant to approximate GNG, and only presumtptions of notability. If people do exhaustive searches and find nothing, it becomes the burden of those who want to keep to show sources that would justify doing so. On the issue of merging the nomination, that is not advised. Since we have people here doing searches about the one person, merging with other nominations would just make the nomination overly long and messy.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.