Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harriet Eddy Middle School - Wikipedia

Article Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep since sourcing has been done. Wizardman 16:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No assertion of notability per WP:N and no verifiability per WP:V. Mh29255 (talk) 18:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Shiva_eVolved 19:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilana^talk_(recall) 01:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jelly the Supermodel (talk) 02:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing notable. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 03:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 05:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 12:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-direct to Elk Grove Unified School District - Unless it is found to be more notable than the average middle school, standard practise as re-directs are cheap. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and listify in district. No content to merge. JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-direct to Elk Grove Unified School District as per Chris; article doesn't meet WP:N. Noroton (talk) 19:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-direct to Elk Grove Unified School District Victuallers (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Verifiable, NPOV, Blue Ribbon School, plenty of independent sources available for expansion. DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article now asserts notability and has actual content. As well, its blue ribbon status puts it in the class of elementary schools that should be kept as standalone articles, imho. JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as modified, the article provides clear claims of notability, particularly in terms of its recognition by the Blue Ribbon Schools Program, supported by appropriate sources to establish notability. Additional sources are listed in the article and should be further integrated into the text of the article. Alansohn (talk) 05:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.