Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Bowman - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Jack Bowman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actor who has had many small roles, but nothing major. Doesn't seem to comply with WP:ACTOR or WP:GNG. PhilKnight (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep None of the Above. The decision to delete a UK actor smells bad when the subject page in question contains a beg for money message from Jimbo Wales. There is clearly way too much East Coast user/admin bias on these deletions. I saw him on stage in London and thought he was a good
actor. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics who have no personal knowledge or have actually seen them perform. Rather than deletionism why not try to improve the content or reach out to the contributors by obtaining more information?
PsychClone (talk) 22:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ignore troll's comments. JDDJS (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. JDDJS (talk) 04:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.