Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kew Park Rangers - Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The user/s who've spent ages making the page would have been well-served spending ages establishing notability. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kew Park Rangers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable football (soccer) club; WP:CORP states that only clubs in the top ten levels of the English football league system are considered inherently notable. No other grounds for notability have been stated in the article.

• Delete as nom. Qwghlm 22:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Qwghlm 22:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Angelo 02:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Come on, someone's spent ages making this page - show some compassion.--Arunby 07:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please direct readers to the WP policy that states that pages which people have spent ages making are permitted to ignore WP:N, WP:COI, WP:V etc ChrisTheDude 07:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also I'd dispute that the article creator did in fact spend ages on it given that the entire article apart from the short "current times" section at the end is a direct copy-and-paste from their own website..... ChrisTheDude 08:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The nominator has it summed up perfectly. Suriel1981 10:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A line has to be drawn somewhere, and this team is well below that line. Daemonic Kangaroo 08:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.