Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirpichli, Turkmenistan - Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kirpichli, Turkmenistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem notable and the citations seem bogus. Qwerfjkltalk 14:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkmenistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. All settlements are notable. This weather.com page and others like it suggest that GEOnet's people found something there, but it isn't clear what. Perhaps a Turkmenistan government gazeteer or census site is available online, or we could wait until GEOnet comes back up. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this looks like a directory of settlement names in Turkmenistan, but I don't want to deal with it. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:36, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the time being, unsourced, and there is no evidence that this is a settlement. Created by a user now blocked for, well, creating hoaxes.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Not a hoax. A gas condensate field nearby is a source of natural gas. I added a reference to confirm this. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This [1] mentions Kirpichli as aul in 1931. At least it was a settlement in 1930s. Very likely it is a settlement now. -GorgonaJS (talk) 12:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as it has been shown not to be a hoax and meets GEOLAND as well. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 12:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as it meets geolandJackattack1597 (talk) 11:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.