Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mic check (rapper) - Wikipedia

Article Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. When the album is out, I have no strong feelings against recreation. Tone 13:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a possible vanity page to me. Article claims he has a recording contract with Sony Records, but no sources are present to verify this claim. I formally declare shenanigans. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - seems to be hoax/non-notable, unreferenced. Almost certainly a vanity page. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 08:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keeper His notability is out there as far as im concerned just do a Google search of mic check CT or Wolcott and you will get a bus load of links to click away on also his site has the artical from sonys page [1] Dell_dell.

Delete No notability yet, good luck with the forthcoming album, Mr. Check. pablo_hablo. 09:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have found alot of information on this artist from his offical website and google searched also if you look on sonymusic.com and you search for artisit hes under the TBD cat. you have to take your time and look though its not going to jump out at you. oldschool411

KEEP!! This guys myspace page has over 100,000 plays and close to 100,000 views with several youtube videos up and over 18,000 fans on his page alone definitly notable enough for me. Likethis

Delete for non-notability; admin, don't pay too much attention to the three above keep votes by SPAs whose style and content are eerily similar. Drmies (talk) 04:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are all blocked I believe. pablo_hablo. 07:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Drmies (talk) 14:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have struck out the keep votes as the three users have all been blocked as sockpuppets. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Besides the misinformation that he signed to Sony, there's nothing to assert notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.