Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael C. Fina - Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michael C. Fina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMOTIONAL article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:18, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. AllyD (talk) 08:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I agree that the article sounds a bit promotional, so it requires a re-write, but I dont think it should be deleted on that basis alone. The subject is notable and passes WP:ORGCRIT and WP:SIRS --RealPharmer3 (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above - I agree that this article needs a rewrite and trim, but the actual subject looks independently notable. 193.37.240.168 (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Has a three-page profile with additional sources in International directory of company histories. Vol. 52. St. James Press. 2003. ISBN 978-1-55862-693-5., meeting the requirements of WP:CORP. Jfire (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.