Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyInfo (2nd nomination) - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Normally, one "keep" would not be considered a consensus but since the nominator is not arguing for deletion and the original nominator is cool with the article, it's probably safe to assume that this article is not going to be deleted today (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- MyInfo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original Afd closed as delete, but new sources were brought to light at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_March_16, at which the decision was made to relist this for consideration of the sources. (I am personally neutral on the deletion.) Aervanath (talk) 04:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- comment from guy who made the first afd
The new sources presented at the DRV:
- Nominated for best Business Software Application by Shareware Industry Awards
- Reviewed by Wall Street Journal Online columnist Jeremy Wagstaff
- The guy writing this blog has in his linkedin profile the following, among other good looking things:
- Technology Columnist at The Asian Wall Street Journal, Wall Street Journal Online
- Reporter at The Wall Street Journal
- Page One Editor etc at Dow Jones, The Asian Wall Street Journal
- The guy writing this blog has in his linkedin profile the following, among other good looking things:
- DonationCoder Notetaking Software Roundup #1
- More links: this, reviewed in San Diego Daily Transcript, this, and included in DMOZ
errrr, well, the loosewire blog plus the award probably make it for me. I would no longer nominate it. --Enric Naval (talk) 07:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The award alone is enough to save this one. Given by a notable organization with expert selection panel.- Mgm|(talk) 10:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.