Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oneirophobia - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Transwiki to Wiktionary. —Doug Bell talk 09:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a dictionary Jvhertum 13:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki, to wikitionary. There doesn't appear to be an entry for it yet. Mallanox 14:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, probably speedily. Copyvio, not a dictionary, etc. --Yamla 16:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 17:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, although I don't feel a 4-word definition is a copyvio. Michaelas10 (Talk) 18:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Addhoc 10:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki without prejudice to someone (including the editor who wrote this definition) writing about Oneirophobia - the above book search appears to indicate there is sufficient information avaialable. Addhoc 10:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.