Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River of Life Assembly of God - Wikipedia

Article Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 05:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An advertising piece for a non notable church. Harland1 (^t/_c) 10:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No independent sources, no particular claim of notability, spammy in tone. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 11:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Throw into the River of Deletion Not so much advertising as blatant preaching. This isn't the place for that. Ψν^Psi_nu 11:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create this article for advertisement but for information.... River of Life Assembly of God is the fasted growing Church in the Minot area. It has gone from a congregation of 35 to over 200 in under 6 weeks. As I understand, Wikipedia is an information site... all I have wrote about River of Life is information and i will continue to edit.... I have not included its specific location or other advertising devices. Minot citizens are curious about this fast growing Church and curiosity should be met with nothing else than a wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrb53 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

This was posted on my talk page so I moved it here so people could see it, for what it's worth. Harland1 (^t/_c) 12:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- If indeed "Minot citizens are curious about this fast growing Church," then why don't they just GO THERE? It's not like Minot, North Dakota is Los Angeles or Tokyo. "Curiosity should be met with nothing else than a wikipedia page"? It's astounding that religion flourished before Wikipedia, what with the crippling lack of ability to get the word out before then. Sheesh. Ψν^Psi_nu 12:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:SOAP, WP:RS, and WP:SPAM. Bearian (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC) P.S. Wikipedia is not an information site. Bearian (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:CORP; no assertion of notability and no cites, nor does it seem likely that there would be any, based on a description of size and "growing". Mere "growth" is hardly notable anyway. We don't have articles on every single black hole. --Lquilter (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.