Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sana Javed - Wikipedia

Article Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus to keep. Note that I'm not closing it as a speedy keep because it doesn't meet the criteria, please see WP:SK#NOT. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 00:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person fails a notability test. Just because the person has been an international athlete does not make her notable. There are no references provided other than player profile.

(Update) I recommended the article for deletion because there is no notable information included in this page. I did not think that merely creating a page with a single sentence merited notability. I am aware that international sportspersons are considered notable, but surely there should be enough information about the person to merit a Wikipedia page besides a single sentence. Thank you! Manoflogan (talk) 04:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:CRIN as an international cricketer. This is verified by both sources in the article, whether they are player profiles or not are irrelevant. Jevansen (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - nominator appears to be unaware of WP:CRIN and WP:NCRIC. St Anselm (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Playing in Women's One Day International cricket is enough to pass WP:NCRIC. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.