Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting - Wikipedia
Article Images
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEPT per WP:SNOW/no argument for deletion provided my nomionator. Jeremy (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Speedy keep articles on school shootings with far fewer victims clearly meet WP:GNG. 3,000+ Google news hits. 2010 SO16 (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's just happened. Do you think everything with lots of Google hits should have a page? By that definition there should be a plethora of articles on Kate Middleton's pregnancy. --86.40.98.239 (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - no question. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep': Get this AfD off the page ASAP, this is bullshit. Its notable, we all know it. Mass death.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Excuse me? Is that supposed to be an intelligent argument for keep? --86.40.98.239 (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Uh...: This is like not allowing the September 11 attacks page to exist. 24.130.40.143 (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you serious? You're comparing a school shooting to Sept 11? --86.40.98.239 (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - worse school attack in American history. --Pinkkeith (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Close per WP:IAR. We should not waste time going through this AfD process. There is a ton of precedent to have an article on a shooting like this. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.