- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:42, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Seyyed Mohammad Reza Saeedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails general notability. Cleric that has done nothing except being a cleric (which does not automatically make the subject notable). JoseJan89 (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG, and has zero notability apart from being a cleric. ImperialMajority (talk) 14:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 03:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since clerics are not inherently notable, and that is all he seems to have going for himself here. WP:GNG does not seem to be met in this article. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.