Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stallion - Wikipedia

Article Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I love the music of Ween, and this article is funny, but it's far from encyclopedic. It seems to consist entirely of original research. I suggest we delete it unless sources can be found. Maybe there's another wiki we can move it to? GTBacchus^(talk) 04:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, OR. Edeans 21:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 15:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. Need sources and cleaned up. Could be OR, could be notable. It's a tossup in my mind. It was created two years ago and seems to have just become more of a mess in that time. - grubber 17:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to be OR. Will change my opinion if a reliable source is provided. Shimeru 10:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid 64 19:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless reliable sources can be found – Qxz 20:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - After about 20 minutes googling, and searching various sites, I didn't turn up anything that looked like a reliable, non-trivial source for the article. The current article looks a lot like OR, and isn't exactly pretty-K@ngi e ^meep! 02:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Save!- this article is about an opinionated topic in the first place and it offers interesting ideas that can't be found anywhere else. There is no one set meaning to these songs, probably not even to the weens themselves. If the topic were highly dependent on facts and black and white, I would say definately delete it, but have some creativity my friends :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.58.174.96 (talk • contribs) 03:19, February 16, 2007 (UTC).
That's just the trouble, though. We have this no original research policy, so the very fact that it can't be found anywhere else is sufficient reason to delete it, because it's not "verifiable" in any outside source. In this case, it pains me to say it, but them's the rules. -GTBacchus^(talk) 23:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.