Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Batuello - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thomas Batuello (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Fails WP:ENT: one notable role. Fails WP:GNG insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources (sources cited are trivial mentions). Prod removed claiming lack of notability is not clear. SummerPhD (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Naked Brothers Band, where Batuello is already mentioned in the "Casting" section. Not enough to suggest he is independently notable (at least not yet...) The most in depth source I could find was this, where we learn he likes mint chocolate chip ice cream. Moswento talky 08:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per above; plausible search term. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to show that this person meets WP:GNG or WP:ENT at this time. Gongshow talk 09:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.