- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Vladislav Belyayev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. This editor, despite being counseled that footballers need to pass GNG, continues to create these stubs about footballers who, even if WP:NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, wouldn't meet even that low bar. Onel5969 TT me 10:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 10:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article about non-notable semi-pro footballer which fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 17:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG Lightburst (talk) 00:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.