Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vonk (pubic toupee) - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Vonk (pubic toupee) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. The author states, in the edit summary of the article's creation, that he created this page to resolve a dispute in a private blog. Delete. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 13:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – If anything, it should be in Wiktionary, as it already is, as noted here. Shoessss | Chat 13:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom., WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT. JohnCD (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - The article is well sourced, non-commercial in its nature, and is at the very least in keeping with the other articles in the Fetish clothing manufacturers category. A quick search demonstrates how widely used the term is, in numerous languages. Jmckean55 (talk) 15:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NoFew related ghits outside Wikipedia. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 15:07, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Comment – You are absolutely, 100%, exactly right! It is a term! As such, it should be in Wiktionary. Which it already is! Delete as an article. Shoessss | Chat 15:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not well sourced. It cites a wiki that that you yourself edited only a few hours ago to add the information to in the first place and Urban Dictionary, which encourages people to just make up stuff, as two of its sources. Neither of those are acceptable sources. Please provide proper sources. Uncle G (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax. Vonk a
Dutchslang term for penis? No way. AecisBrievenbus 12:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Nowhere does the article claim 'vonk' is Dutch slang. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.68.208 (talk) 09:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I stand corrected on that. AecisBrievenbus 00:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nowhere does the article claim 'vonk' is Dutch slang. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.68.208 (talk) 09:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.