Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates - Wikipedia
Article Images
Removing Good and Featured Topics in Wikipedia If you feel a topic on Wikipedia:Featured topics or a topic on Wikipedia:Good topics should no longer be there, then this is the place to nominate it for demotion. Only topics that do not adhere to the good or featured topic criteria should be listed. Objections raised must be actionable. Do not nominate topics that have recently been promoted (such complaints should have been brought up during the candidacy period on Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates), or topics that have recently survived a removal attempt—such nominations are likely to be removed summarily. Once a topic has been nominated on this page for ten days, the discussion will be assessed for consensus by one of the FGTC coordinators, who will close the discussion. If there is consensus to remove, it will be removed from the list of featured topic, and added to the list of former featured topics. All discussions will be logged at Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/archive. The removal instructions are located here. |
Good content: Featured and good topic tools: |
Nomination procedure
Please read all the articles of the nominated topic fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.
Consensus must be reached for a topic to be removed from featured status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. As a general guide, new topics will remain on here for at least 10 days to allow for comment, and must have at least 4 remove votes (although consensus and lack of major objections are also important) for removal. |
"Everybody" is missing from the topic, which is not currently a GA, and hence the topic does not currently meet the criteria. Article was created on 1 Feb 2024. Theknine2 (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Physical Attraction" was created a year ago (September 2023), and still hasn't been promoted to GA. Given the scope of the article, it's not difficult to promote to GA, but in the meantime the topic does not meet the criteria. Theknine2 (talk) 16:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Intercontinental Cup (IC) winning manager list did not exist at the time of promotion in 2008. Similar to the winning clubs topic, the IC was a UEFA-organised club competition and is included in the lead's list. Unless someone promotes the list, this topic does not satisfy the criteria for a complete topic (criteria 1. d). Idiosincrático (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I plan on doing some work on the IC winning managers this weekend, and will nominate it at FLC once the IC finals list has a bit more support. NapHit (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi @NapHit, just wanted to check in and see how this is going? Aza24 (talk) 21:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've fixed the accessibility issues on the tables and I'm going to tidy up the lead over the weekend and then nominate it at FLC now that my current list has three supports. NapHit (talk) 21:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update The Intercontinental Cup list is now at FLC. NapHit (talk) 21:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hold per above. Idiosincrático (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]- Keep and support supplementary nomination to include Intercontinental Cup – Idiosincrático (talk) 03:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hold per NapHit Cos (X + Z) 19:11, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Keep now that List of Intercontinental Cup winning managers is promoted. Cos (X + Z) 00:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]