I've listed this article for peer review because... I would like to know if it could qualify to be a good article. Also if it needs any change in the wording, etc.
Thanks, JD John M. Turner (talk) 20:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generalissima's thoughts
- I'd remove the combat infobox; this wasn't a both-sided thing, and it wasn't only against Shining Path members.
- I would add in the section of background context that eugenics had been proposed but never implemented until Fujimori's regime to the beginning part of the lede.
- I feel some reviewers might be confused why three of the journal articles (the two Chaparro‐Buitrago sources and Chávez & Coe 2007) aren't used but are cited. I'd recommend using these or putting them in further reading if not useful.
- I think you want to generally avoid hatnoting red links.
- There's a complete lack of images here; for the act itself I can imagine that there'd be little in the way of PD/CC images, but you can at least put in a picture of Fujimori, and any later feminist activists etc.
- Giulia Tamayo uses the term "health festivals" but this isn't ever discussed earlier in the article (and should probably be given a Spanish translation if thats a translated phrase)
That's all from an initial read-through. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Generalissima, I have followed your recommendations to improve the article, could you please let me know if there is anything else that could be improved? Thanks in advance. JD John M. Turner (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]