Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase - Wikipedia
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations. BlueboyLINY (talk) 06:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- User(s) blocked: 2600:1001:b000::/40 (talk · contribs). 1-year partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 10:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 07:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Remsense is continuously putting biased pov unsourced nonsense into this article. I have just reverted it to the non-pov version with reference sources to support all the information, unlike Remsense who has provided NO REFERENCES whatsoever for his biased pov edits. Thank you128.90.165.16 (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome! I shouldn't have to justify content issues here, but the sockpuppet has already been patiently told why their additions weren't accepted, and they have very little to do with POV, but structure, style and coherence. Remsense ‥ 论 07:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- STOP posting biased lies on this article Remsense, you did not provide any reference sources for your biased pov edits. I have provided numerous academic reference sources to the non-pov version, I did you a favor since you either uneducated in history or just being a vandal, You’re Welcome..!! 128.90.165.16 (talk) 07:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone else needs to deal with this, because I've already reacted more than I should have. Just put an "East Asians" top level section there outside where it should go over and over, whatever. I shouldn't've restored that content, I'll fess up. But you didn't communicate in response to me about what was actually wrong until now or respond to the things I pointed out were wrong. I'm not looking forward to the EW block I probably deserve for this, because I've really been trying to do better since my first one. But someone fix up those additions, please. Remsense ‥ 论 07:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- STOP posting biased lies on this article Remsense, you did not provide any reference sources for your biased pov edits. I have provided numerous academic reference sources to the non-pov version, I did you a favor since you either uneducated in history or just being a vandal, You’re Welcome..!! 128.90.165.16 (talk) 07:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome! I shouldn't have to justify content issues here, but the sockpuppet has already been patiently told why their additions weren't accepted, and they have very little to do with POV, but structure, style and coherence. Remsense ‥ 论 07:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Remsense is continuously putting biased pov unsourced nonsense into this article. I have just reverted it to the non-pov version with reference sources to support all the information, unlike Remsense who has provided NO REFERENCES whatsoever for his biased pov edits. Thank you128.90.165.16 (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Remsense, you need to stop posting biased POV edits that have no academic reference sources backing it up. Am I wrong to to say that? I have simply posted a NON-POV edit in accordance with Wikipedia policy guidelines about neutral points of view and supported everything with academic reference sources unlike you who keeps posting biased pov edits with NO REFERENCES to support it. You should be thanking me for doing you a favor and keeping this article historically accurate and supported by academic reference sources. Thanks 128.90.165.16 (talk) 08:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Like I said, I realize it was wrong and contributed to you feeling you had to do what you did wrong. Together, we disrupted the article and I wish I had done better. How's that? Remsense ‥ 论 08:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Listen, I’m not ripping on you or disrespecting you in any way. I am just telling you that we need to keep this article historical accurate and factual backed up with academic reference sources and not just the biased pov opinions that you keep pushing. Peace, Love and Understanding..!! 128.90.165.16 (talk) 08:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Like I said, I realize it was wrong and contributed to you feeling you had to do what you did wrong. Together, we disrupted the article and I wish I had done better. How's that? Remsense ‥ 论 08:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Remsense, you need to stop posting biased POV edits that have no academic reference sources backing it up. Am I wrong to to say that? I have simply posted a NON-POV edit in accordance with Wikipedia policy guidelines about neutral points of view and supported everything with academic reference sources unlike you who keeps posting biased pov edits with NO REFERENCES to support it. You should be thanking me for doing you a favor and keeping this article historically accurate and supported by academic reference sources. Thanks 128.90.165.16 (talk) 08:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- To admins: I messed up here. The article is in a much better state content-wise and likely doesn't need protection. While the IP socked, they did so in response to my careless reverting in response to other issues I saw first. Sorry to all about this. Remsense ‥ 论 08:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn by requestor. Favonian (talk) 10:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Successive vandalism for multiple reasons (caste, political rivalries, etc.) Drusekoana (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- User(s) blocked: 38.222.128.0/18 (talk · contribs).
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Electrou (formerly Susbush) (talk) 12:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 13:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]