Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase - Wikipedia


Article Images

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — Czello (music) 16:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we do that, since we usually go to full-protection for only a few days and MediaWiki does not currently allow us to layer full and semi-protections, the article would remain unprotected when the protection expires until we could reprotect it if necessary. Might 1RR be a better option? Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1RR would be a decent solution as this is a CTOPs article — Czello (music) 07:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done And logged at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism in AFD. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last was a couple of days ago. I am really loathe to protect AfDs (although I have done it) since it could be seen as tipping the process toward one side or the other. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP addresses has continued after a previous protection. SB678 (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated edits, mostly by unregistered users, changing his nationality from Russian to Ukrainian without any discussion. [1] [2] [3] [4]

That dispute itself is covered in the article and no serious scholar considers him Ukrainian in any meaningful way. --Երևանցի talk 08:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 10:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 12:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive addition of unsourced content. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:3813:C301:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks (this is hardly the only article they've been doing this on, and they were blocked for this a couple of months ago as well. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, likely related to the war. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Svito3 (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under CT/EE due to the current disruption involving Poland and Ukraine. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - We have a series of IPs who're claiming SSR is still alive and being hidden by his management - a far cry from what was the case even last year but still not something supported by the sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Nthep. for one year. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think it would be a good idea to protect this article so that users without an account cannot edit them, since for about a month there has been a user with an IP from Macedonia (the last one he used was 77.29.162.92) who is constantly being blocked because he keeps vandalizing football team articles (Málaga CF, Real Oviedo, Granada CF, Athletic Bilbao, FK Partizan, FK Voždovac, etc.) AlejandroR1990 (talk) 16:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 77.29.128.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and disruption Kaustubh42 (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Arbitration enforcement: WP:CT/AI. Multiple non-EC editors have edited a contentious topic area on this page. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not going with indef here because I doubt there will be this level of editing interest come April. Will log at CTOPS, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An editor is using multiple IP addresses to edit the page, falsely claiming that two episodes that were left unaired in the US aired. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Reason: High level of vandalism by sockpuppet. Jassu712 (talk) 19:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Reason: High level of vandalism bh sockpuppet IP Address and account. Jassu712 (talk) 19:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protection: Reason: High level of IP vandalism by sockpuppet account and one user was blocked for edit war but he still using sockpuppet account and IP address. Jassu712 (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing on a newly released popular film, mostly by IPs (specifically from the 103.38.17.0/24 range which has already been blocked once for this [likely connected to the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Symon Sadik). These edits disrupt the lead/ib despite Talk page consensus to the contrary. Gotitbro (talk) 20:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That range hasn't edited the article in at least a few days. Recent history shows few reverts if any. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring from Colorado IP range Special:Contributions/2601:283:4600:7050:0:0:0:0/64, blocked once last April. Disruption also from France IPs. Binksternet (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, both times this change has been reverted, the explanations have been unhelpful and somewhat bitey (i.e., remove unsourced text when the text includes sources, and Rv edit warring when it's the second attempt to add the text). Protecting this article for a single editor making what appears to be good faith edits is not justified. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DrKay (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator DrKay. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Favored target of an LTA (Sevgilerde) using too wide of an IP range to block. All IP edits over the past 12 months have been disruptive. Sable232 (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP spam. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked blocked by Favonian. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @SNUGGUMS: Please don't use this kind of edit summary. It starts off confrontational and focuses on the other editor instead of the content. Overall, it's bitey and it's no wonder the other editor made the same edit again. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what comes off as confrontational about pointing out inaccuracies or defiance of a hidden note that was meant to be followed. Nevertheless, this is far from the only IP who did such things, and leaving the page unprotected isn't helping matters. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: Starting a summary with a word like "False" reads as an attempt to shut down any discussion. Combined with "you shouldn't have ignored" and "fabricated claims", the tone feels accusatory and confrontational. These types of edit summaries are more likely to escalate disagreements (which happened) than result in a civil discussion.
By the way, I wonder whether adding a link to a talk page discussion might help with that inline comment.
As to protecting the page, only one IP editor has edited the article in the last 16 days. One person making the same edit twice isn't sufficient justification to protect an article, especially in these circumstances. The protection policy discusses the general principles involved in its lead and first section. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: disruptive editing Skyerise (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism; immediately resumed after unprotection 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinte semi-protection: Ipersistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi -protection: persistent disruptive editing in the past 3 weeks. pc not working. at least 25 previous protections. That's enough 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Mdelvins (talk · contribs) blocked by Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 22:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Reason: Persisent addition of an identical non-constructive trivia edit by multiple accounts: 60.227.221.174, Funify01, and Forggot112. Rift (talk) 23:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also warned the IP editor about edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism; Palm Desert IP added Tibetan characters 2603:8080:D03:89D4:59E0:F5C3:2AAF:E3E9 (talk) 23:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Isi96 (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And doesn't have much direct connection to recent events. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users keeps replacing the high quality infobox image with low quality. [5] [6] Requires WP:SEMI protection. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: To allow a finished draft be moved to mainspace. UV is bugged, so I'm forced to put a different thing but I'm trying to have this unsalted. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partially done. Create-unprotected, but until the article's in mainspace we can't do anything else. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. Partially done, see response by Daniel Case. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, no I only wanted it unsalted, but for some reason UV forces me to select anything that's not "No Protection", so I was forced to press semi-prot instead. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 08:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AlphaBetaGamma: You can submit requests to lower page protection levels at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease. You can also manually edit requests after submitting them to fix up any mistakes. I'll take care of that now for this request. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Note: Changed Indefinite pending changes protection to Unprotection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Unprotected by Daniel Case. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing edit warring/content dispute. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing and edit-warring by several IPs and User:Epnesthede. I suppose the IPs are Epnesthede himself. They also refuse to discus the issue at the talk-page. Only blynd revert of the stable version. Jingiby (talk) 03:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article has not been edited since it was created 18 years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I am sorry Daniel Case, the correct spelling is distinct and the real article is Krste Misirkov. May you check the case again. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 07:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Note: Changed request from Kraste Misirkov to Krste Misirkov. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE. Long term disruptive editing over his caste.[7][8] last 500 revisions. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – intense vandalism after last pp expired. Ca talk to me! 05:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of Sourced content. MRRaja001 (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No idea what the edit warring is about, but the entire edit history is reverts of IP editors. Worth semi-protecting, perhaps an admin should issue some blocks, too. Toadspike [Talk] 09:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 207.136.93.6 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. [9] [10] [11] JoshuaJ28 (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Disruptive editing from various IP addresses with similar GeoLocs over the past couple of weeks. Barry Wom (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Disruptive editing from various IP addresses with similar GeoLocs over the past couple of weeks. Barry Wom (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Quinlan, the article needs protecting, the IP user is hopping IPs, they've made the same edit since your message Darkwarriorblake (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They have not made the same edit since the blocks. Most of the disruption was from one IPv6 address and one IPv4 range, both of which are blocked now. If they resume, please report the involved IPs with links to repeated edits to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection Disruptive editing from various IP addresses with similar GeoLocs over the past couple of weeks. Barry Wom (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted harassment, originating from Twitter. Request assistance Fml657 (talk) 10:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by User:Yoshutup. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 10:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just two edits today. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For some inexplicable reason, ‘not bebop’ is inserted on this page (see version history) every few weeks by IP addresses that are apparently not logged in. This is annoying. :-) Tuxman (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – New editors have been frequently adding irrelevant and/or unreliable content as of late, with some adding references without the content it claims to cite. Milesq (talk) 12:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Wikipageant (talk · contribs). from the article for a week, since it's in an area subject to community sanctions (WP:GS/PAGEANT). Let's see if that gives them the hint they need. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several accounts and IP's attempted to delete the crimes section at least 5 times this very week. نوحفث   Let's Chat! 12:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A string of IPs all trying to add the same POV and unsourced edits today. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the article so shouldn't protect it, but I support this. Doug Weller talk 13:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Located in a country involved in the IPC YannisL (talk) 13:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined: we don't protect every city page in Israel or Palestine. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by removing sourced information. Semsûrî (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GSCASTE, IP hopper edit warring. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I believe only account holders should edit the article (if not just for a temporary period), as the film has been controversial and IP editors are not adding constructive edits to it or vandalizing as well. Trillfendi (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It doesn't look like every IP edit is getting reverted, and the article is getting a lot of attention at the moment, as eagerly anticipated new films tend to. I'm not even sure pending changes would be justified. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive edits and personal attacks by IPs. Sid95Q (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's just that one IP, a couple of times, and they've been warned. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant disruptive edits by IPs asking for protection, when there is no vandalizism to the list. Catfurball (talk) 15:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, on-going disruptive editing by anonymous editors from beginning of article's creation, due to its recent events status. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continually changing the player's club/introducing factual errors before the player's been traded; please protect for two weeks to limit majority of these edits until after the trade period ends – thanks. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 16:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also put {{current sports transaction}} banner on page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unconstructive IPs attempting to use the talk page as a forum, likely after reading the recently published news article on the page. --Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 17:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Black Kite. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Violations of the Biographies of Living Persons. An I.P. keeps changing Walmsley L's nationality to Greek, and saying that she was born in Athens Greece. 142.114.1.184 (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New user, possibly using multiple accounts (compare the following edits: 1, 2, and 3), continues to make the same edit about a Pakistani incident that is unrelated to this article's subject. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – New user Kokoonore (talk · contribs · count) now 198.232.116.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) infobox content removal and prose removal. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Hello, we are getting daily IP posts in the talk page with insults etc directed at the subject of the article. Not sure if protection is warranted at this point?. — Diannaa (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition/removal of content about a new book due to be released in November, examples:[12][13][14][15][16][17]. The IP beginning with 145 seems to be the more disruptive of other users involved in the mass editing over recent days. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]