- Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
Suspected sockpuppets
- PadFoot2008 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- HistorianOP (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
- PadFoot2008[1][2] and Rawna Praveen singh solanki's[3][4] extensive editing of Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty with the same kind of edits on same dynasty page.[5]
- HistorianOP created a similar page as Rawna Praveen singh solanki[10] and P S chalukya[11] created before as Dewal Pratihars[12] but this time with a different name Pratihara-Rajput.[13] seems like WP:Duck to me.
@Vanamonde93, is familiar with this sockfarm. 2401:BA80:AA0F:552C:3:1:BCAE:C62E (talk) 01:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Note The filing OP shows behavioural similarities to socks belonging to Anujror sock farm. This SPI case is likely in retaliation of SPI cases filed there , see [14]. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I am marginally WP:INVOLVED with respect to PadFoot2008 and cannot take administrative action in this instance, though I am explicitly not otherwise INVOLVED with respect to the sockfarm. I do find the overlap between the accounts named here suspicious. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I would put the reported accounts at Unrelated, and the archived accounts are stale. Attaching either to the master will be a matter of Behavioural evidence needs evaluation since I doubt useful data remains from the last time the master was reviewed. Izno (talk) 01:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
