Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 October 24 - Wikipedia
Unused Template:Infobox Canadian political party/ templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to infobox settlement. Also a bit suspcious of the indication it is a seperate country, looks like Catalan seperatism to me... Himalayan 21:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and replace with {{Infobox settlement}}. A city is a clear case of a settlement, and it is undesirable for settlement templates to be regionalized down to the sub-national level. (Imagine the proliferation of redundant templates that approach would create: Infobox Ontario city, Infobox Norfolk city, Infobox Aquitaine city, etc.) --RL0919 (talk) 20:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by OverlordQ (talk · contribs) with a reason of "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Closing this discussion since OverlordQ seems to have overlooked that detail. (Non-admin closure.) --RL0919 (talk) 15:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and useless template. It appears to be a summary which has no purpose when transcluding. ZooFari 16:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.