Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 May 3 - Wikipedia
2011 USA Sevens Fixtures Pools
Big 12 women's basketball standings
English cricket seasons
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a pet project template of a single person. Concept and content is not what could be called neutral (NPOV). Almost all topics within the template, coincidentally I'm sure, are heavily edited by this man ("Freechild"). Ratheton (talk) 20:45, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - NPOV. Appears crafted to deliver a message Drenver (talk) 02:59, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] - note - Template author now notified. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for extending this courtesy Plastikspork. • Freechildtalk 04:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Youth empowerment is a field of study in higher education and a professional area of practice. The template is designed to reflect topics within that conversation. If its an incorrect usage of a navigation tool then it should be deleted. • Freechildtalk 04:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is actually the second nomination for this template. I nominated it for deletion 4 years ago at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 14#Template:Youth Empowerment. --Orlady (talk) 02:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral - I'm still not wildly supportive of this template. It still smells of POV. However, it's vastly improved from the template the version that I wanted to delete back in 2007, and I think it probably meets guidelines. --Orlady (talk) 02:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.