Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 12 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:31, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:The Krusty Krab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This is currently a single-use template. It is only used on the Krusty Krab article. I suggest we subst and delete. Like in other similar templates that were deleted, WP:NFCC rule#9 prohibits putting a fair use image directly into the template namespace, and thus prevents such a fair use image in this infobox. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Subst and delete per nom -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 06:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- this is why we have {{Infobox fictional business}}. 174.56.57.138 (talk) 09:01, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Subst and delete per nom and 174.56.57.138.—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Is this the reason why it's being discussed for deletion? Because it's only used for one atricle? This isn't the only template that is used on just one article. Template:Big Brother UK sidebar is only used for BBUK and Template:Big Brother U.S. sidebar is only used for BBUS. Unreal7 (talk) 16:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- seems like it is being discussed for deletion since there is already another perfectly applicable infobox for this purpose, namely {{infobox fictional business}}. also, since we cannot have non-fair use templates in template space, this fixes the issue by putting the image directly in the article. in the other two cases you cited, those are sidebars, not infoboxes. although, there are also single use infoboxes out there but that would be WP:OTHERSTUFF. Frietjes (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a pointless discussion. Unreal7 (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- to have a template deleted, we need to have a discussion, unless you are going to tag it with {{db-author}}. it appears your other two examples have now been nominated for deletion as well. Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a pointless discussion. Unreal7 (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- seems like it is being discussed for deletion since there is already another perfectly applicable infobox for this purpose, namely {{infobox fictional business}}. also, since we cannot have non-fair use templates in template space, this fixes the issue by putting the image directly in the article. in the other two cases you cited, those are sidebars, not infoboxes. although, there are also single use infoboxes out there but that would be WP:OTHERSTUFF. Frietjes (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.