Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 November 29 - Wikipedia

Article Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Need consensus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template says "This article needs consensus". Afaik, all articles needs consensus. Thus the template is pretty pointless... _→AzaToth 19:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, seems like if this template is added to an article, it would be because of some underlying reason, for which a more targeted template would be a lot more informative and useful anyway. -— Isarra ༆ 19:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just read WP:CONSENSUS instead. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 03:03, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too vague and open ended. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Debresser (talk) 09:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment seems to me this would only be used on content dispute edit war articles... which would be locked down because of it... -- 70.24.250.110 (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. –sumone10154^(talk) 21:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. - ʈucoxn\^talk 08:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That we do not have a generic dispute tag is a feature, not a bug. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:15, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All articles need consensus. Ryan Vesey 16:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Too vague, much as above. Presumably it's meant to mark unusually controversial articles, but it's too vague for that purpose. --GRuban (talk) 19:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are more appropriate alternatives. -- FutureTrillionaire (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox PBA player (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It can be covered by {{Infobox basketball biography}}. PBA is the Philippines Basketball Association. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
merge. indeed, the {{Infobox basketball biography}} template has PBA specific parameters already, so just add any that are still missing. Frietjes (talk) 00:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Frietjes. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 02:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Let's just stay as it is. It can be covered, but it needs to be specific. When it is the Philippine (remove the 's', Magioaditis) Basketball Association and most of the player's nationalities are Filipino, it's flag is the Philippines. Pits Confer Guests 11:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]