Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 30 - Wikipedia


Article Images
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and almost all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 23:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Frietjes: I'll work on fixing it, and making it useful. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Now transcluded and Iazyges appears to want to work on it further.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob13Talk 04:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iazyges how are you going to eliminate the overlap with Template:Campaignbox Mongol invasions and conquests? Frietjes (talk) 14:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Likely with the addition of other battles, I will see what I can find to add to it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Iazyges, so you are going to remove content from Template:Campaignbox Mongol invasions and conquests? as it stands right now, that template navigates between the articles. I have no idea why you put it at the bottom of the article when it's a campaignbox/sidebar and not a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 22:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: After having a look around, i've realized the template is pretty much useless, as of now, as while it has 4 blue links, 3 are to the "mongol invasion of vietnam" and only one is a battle. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).