Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 19 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:New Castle County, Delaware. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hundreds in Delaware are archaic geographic subdivisions which are meaningless today. This one appears to be a duplicate of Template:New Castle County, Delaware with some entries removed. I have to guess that membership in this template is a matter of WP:OR anyway since nobody actually cares any longer. Mangoe (talk) 12:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no benefit over the county list. Reywas92Talk 14:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the entries that aren't in the New Castle template to that one (from a quick look, ones like Claymont Addition, Delaware, Rock Manor, Delaware, and Naamans Manor, Delaware aren't in the NCC one.) There is no good reason to have one by archaic subdivision rather than handle it all at the county level. Hog Farm Talk 14:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Merge what isn't included on the New Castle Template then delete this template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Despite two weeks of discussion, the template has remained unused. ✗plicit 10:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused; was replaced by {{High Speed 2 RDT}}. Mackensen (talk) 01:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:14, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. We have a High Speed 2 Phase Two article and thus makes sense to have separate diagrams for the different phases, especially if anyone decided to create a Phase One article. This template offers more information than the (crowded, IMO) all-phases template, so I feel there is a place for both. These route diagram templates are not easy to make, so I feel keeping this one around is beneficial as it may be used in an article in the future, and may still be of interest today. NemesisAT (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- NemesisAT, sure, but it hasn't been linked from anywhere in about eight years. There's no obvious place to use it on High Speed 2#Phase 1: London to Birmingham, where there's already a sizable raster map and a link out to an OpenStreetMap diagram. I also can't speak to whether it's still accurate inasmuch as it hasn't been updated (save for routine maintenance) in all that time. Mackensen (talk) 02:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mackensen:Thanks, I've created a few pages on bridges as tunnels for HS2. I'm not very good with these templates but I'll have a go updating it. NemesisAT (talk) 07:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- NemesisAT, sure, but it hasn't been linked from anywhere in about eight years. There's no obvious place to use it on High Speed 2#Phase 1: London to Birmingham, where there's already a sizable raster map and a link out to an OpenStreetMap diagram. I also can't speak to whether it's still accurate inasmuch as it hasn't been updated (save for routine maintenance) in all that time. Mackensen (talk) 02:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if still unused. After 11 years since being created, if there is no place for it to be used, it is unneeded or unwanted by the community. --Gonnym (talk) 08:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Gonnym. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).