Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 23 - Wikipedia


Article Images
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete for multiple reasons:

AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use templates and should be substituted onto the 2019–20 Coppa Italia Serie C article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second nomination. The website is now dead. Links goto archive.org. Content is not what readers expect. —¿philoserf? (talk) 12:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how these unrelated items belong together in a navbox. It's category material at best, not navbox material. Plus most of these links are to general articles about the car models, not unique custom cars built for TV or film, which would at least be somewhat reasonable for a category, but still not a navbox. As it's constituted now? Absolute junk. oknazevad (talk) 04:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).