Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 27 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:NotRef (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
"This guidance does not restrict linking to websites that are being used as sources to provide content in articles." This description doesn't make any sense as that is what citing sources or at least in part of what citing sources in articles already is. If anything, this template is kind of mimicking the vast number of citation templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Given its basically exclusive use as documentation for Help:CS1 templates, I think, on inclusion in Template:Citation Style documentation/registration, this looks like it should just be substed into that page. Trappist the monk? --Izno (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that the salient point here has already been voiced:
This description doesn't make any sense
. When this text was added to the cs1|2 documentation, I did not contest the addition because I didn't want to enter into combat and drama with the editor who created the template. I am glad to see this TfD and will be happy to see the template (and its content) go away. - —Trappist the monk (talk) 17:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that the salient point here has already been voiced:
- delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).