Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 21 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A largely unnavigable navbox that includes schools under the Mastery Transcript Consortium international group of schools. However, whether it needs to be revised or made into a subpage of the creator until it's ready can be discussed. Not opposed to these two options. But perhaps all the schools should be listed on its own article than on a navbox that includes all schools under this association. The reasoning being that sometimes articles can help better transclude the school articles than a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Basically just a list of schools. It's really article content, and if it's required it should go in Mastery Transcript Consortium or as a separate "List of" article. Fails much of WP:NAVBOX, since the schools are basically not related to each other (except by being in this consortium), the schools don't generally refer to other schools in the consortium, its not WP:BIDIRECTIONAL (if it was a proper navbox it would be included in every school article). Per NAVBOX: "If the collection of articles does not meet these criteria, the articles are likely loosely related. A list, category, or neither, may accordingly be more appropriate." Nigej (talk) 07:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused duplicate of the Evo Morales navbox. The navbox is already transcluded on a number of articles relating to Morales and thus, a sidebar is redundant. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. My own preference is generally for navboxes over sidebars and I think that's what our readers expect nowadays. Nigej (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2022
- Delete per nom + Comment. I created the sidebar; if preference is for navboxes, I say go ahead and delete it. I believe the sidebar might have more information and may be better organized than the navbox so I'd ask for an editor to take a look at the former and transclude relative articles from the sidebar before its deleted. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).