Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 4 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Three links. Everything else is red. No navigational requirement is presented. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to list article and draftify. It should be possible to fill this out to be like the List of Empire ships or List of Victory ships or List of Liberty ships of WWII ships for this WWI ship category -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there are 5 ship articles in the category, so some 2 redirects is missing from the name used on the template to the article name -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- There is nothing to convert. Please stick to the grounds of the nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Ofcourse there's stuff to convert. It's a list of ships, lists of ships exists as articles on Wikipedia. That is the substance of the template, and it should instead be a list article, so it should be listified. Listification is a valid outcome of a TfD (a form of substing with editing), and per WP:CLN this should be a list. This can be accomplished by moving this page to DRAFT:List of Design 1074 ships and removing the navbox formatting, leaving the list. That will then contain the edit history of the base list -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- There is nothing to convert. Please stick to the grounds of the nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The contrived scheming above to save a template that fails well-established standards is counterproductive; just leave it to it's fate of deletion for having insufficient links to navigate. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no main article (see WP:NAVBOX item 4), and two of the three linked articles do not even contain the string "1074" in them, so it is unclear/unsourced whether they belong in this navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).