Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 28 - Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. This navbox has no main article and no links in the body except to tangentially related articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This stub is now in use. Trigenibinion (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This completes a set of templates, it is not standalone. Trigenibinion (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The no-transclusions issue has been fixed. However, while the template links to 6 other articles, there's a bunch of redlinks to fill in. Any comments on those?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Still qualifies for deletion. Tfd is not used to bring attention to create articles. It's up to the creator to have created the articles before the navbox. Same is true for the other set that he created that I nominated on the 23rd. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Different people do different things on Wikipedia. I created the navbox which has data not shown elsewhere. Other people can create the articles guided by it. Trigenibinion (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not how navboxes work. The articles have to exist before a navbox is created. When we refer to links we actually mean the articles. By not enough links, they're aren't enough existing articles for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, that is bottom-up. This is top-down. The best method is bidirectional. Trigenibinion (talk) 14:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not how navboxes work. The articles have to exist before a navbox is created. When we refer to links we actually mean the articles. By not enough links, they're aren't enough existing articles for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not enough links/too loosely affiliated to warrant a navbox. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It has enough links. What happens is that there are many missing articles. Trigenibinion (talk) 12:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Trigenibinion Minor point: This template is not a "stub." Her Pegship (?) 14:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It is still classified as a stub template because the Peruvian auto parts industry was not investigated. Trigenibinion (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read Wikipedia:Stub. Her Pegship (?) 22:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- There are stub categories for templates. Trigenibinion (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read Wikipedia:Stub. Her Pegship (?) 22:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It is still classified as a stub template because the Peruvian auto parts industry was not investigated. Trigenibinion (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Trigenibinion Minor point: This template is not a "stub." Her Pegship (?) 14:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It has enough links. What happens is that there are many missing articles. Trigenibinion (talk) 12:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only 1 blue link. If the red linked articles are actually notable, create those articles first, and then and only then should this template be re-created. The purpose of a template is to link between articles on the same topic- this template does not currently do that. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The categories designated as "Foo stub templates" contain stub templates, i.e. templates to be used to tag stub articles. That doesn't include any other kind of template. Her Pegship (?) 22:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Joseph2302 (talk). Her Pegship (?) 22:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).